Current evidence in AI answers

A focused check found that Ask AI excluded the published Statistics and five-minute reader-check pages from its current-page sources. Both pages are now included in the existing bounded source list, so relevant answers can link to their evidence.
The source and output limits, verification, daily AI allowance and keyword fallback are unchanged. Source-linked answers can still be wrong; inspect the cited pages. No new tool, tracker or data flow was added.

Evidence snapshot

Refreshed Statistics from the existing dashboard and feedback totals. The dashboard showed zero-valued cards and an insufficient-data warning. The page labels traffic unavailable rather than claiming no visitors.
The unavailable labels exposed a narrow-screen overflow in the metric row. It now wraps so both values stay readable.
Three Yes responses remain in the reviewed seven-day window; at least two are known tests. There are no non-test roadmap preferences. This is too little evidence to change priorities or claim reader benefit.
The five-minute reader check is ready for volunteers. No study results, new permissions, LinkedIn post or invitations are claimed. The separate learning-article preview remains unpublished.